alert! COCA
the other day looking for information I found a video that has been around the world and could not let this video shows the extent to which man comes to dress "right" I hope that makes them think and not buy more coats of animals.
is also circulating an e-mail mail with this video that its purpose is to collect names for the relevant authorities take the case on your hands please if you want someone send me an email to mysticorobles@gmail.com and will gladly will forward to put their name on the list.
Saturday, September 15, 2007
Benefits Nutriact Capsules
animal abuse:
Is Coca Cola Zero causes cancer?
According to a comparative study with Coca Cola "Light", the product of the famous Zero gas could bring cancer in humans. Ensure it has a sweetener component completely banned as a health hazard
According to a comparative study with Coca Cola "Light" published in www.sepadefenderse.com.ar, the product of the famous Zero gas could bring cancer in humans.
Both drinks are sugar-free, however the newly promoted version "Zero" brings a sweetener component completely banned by the FDA to be harmful to health. After
surfeit consumers who have suffered so much publicity before summer by Coca Cola for its new product "Zero", come the medical opinions of specialists and the "goodness" or not, the new drink that promises zero tail sugar and an implicit "social success" to all who drink, produced by well-designed advertising materials used in the defendant's release brew.
Consumers are asked to meet the new Coca sister line: What difference has the Zero to Diet Coke? Is not that both lack of sugar in your composition?
Answers are on their labels reading the chemical composition of both: Coca Light has Acesulfame K (16mg /%) and aspartame (24mg /%), achieving a total of 40 mg/100% of drinking, while it is ZERO Sodium cyclamate (27mg%), Acesulfame K (15mg%) and aspartame (12 mg%) making it sweeter than the other (a total of 54 mg/100% of drink).
Given that the sweetener "Sodium cyclamate" is strictly prohibited by the FDA (the body than food control U.S. drug and American) to have demonstrable effects on the generation of cancerous tumors, and cyclamate (U $ S 10 per Kilo) is much cheaper than aspartame (U $ S 152 per Kilo), what Coca Cola will take from now on?
CYCLAMATE:
Cyclamate is the common name of ciclohexilsulfamato.
Expressed in the food industry with the letters E 952. Carcinogenic effects were initially attributed to cyclamate and cyclohexylamine (its main metabolite). Cyclamate is illegal in the U.S. (1969), Britain (1970), France and Japan, but now is an additive approved by the European parliament, with restrictions. Cyclamate is widely used in food and pharmaceutical industry as a sweetener. The maximum daily intake (current) is 7 mg (prior to 2005 11mg) / kg body weight. This substance was first synthesized in 1937, and used as artificial sweetener since 1950. Since 1970, suspecting that it could act as cancer and mutations producer, has banned its use as a food additive in many countries including USA, Japan, England and France. Is 50 times sweeter than sucrose and has a nasty aftertaste that disappears when using mixed with saccharin.
is very stable and not affected by the acidity and warming. Their use is fundamental
in carbonated beverages. Can also be used in yogurts sweetened
and as a tabletop sweetener. Cyclamate as such is less water soluble salts, which are commonly used.
Cyclamate is not considered universally safe food additive. Papers have been published indicating that, in experimental animals, high doses of this substance acts as a carcinogen and teratogen, which means it produces birth defects.
have also been reported other harmful effects caused by ingesting a massive dose, such as elevated blood pressure or production testicular atrophy. The data about its possible carcinogenicity are conflicting. The carcinogenic effect would not be due to the very cyclamate, but a product derived from it, cyclohexylamine, which carcinogenicity is not yet fully clarified.
The human body is not able to convert cyclamate in this derivative, but the bacterial flora in the gut. The degree of transformation depends very much on individuals, as well as varying the magnitude of the potential risk
PD
...." I hope they are useful to all and to be determined which are being taken by God, unfortunately we live in a world where brands are first cuidense life so much.
Is Coca Cola Zero causes cancer?
According to a comparative study with Coca Cola "Light", the product of the famous Zero gas could bring cancer in humans. Ensure it has a sweetener component completely banned as a health hazard
According to a comparative study with Coca Cola "Light" published in www.sepadefenderse.com.ar, the product of the famous Zero gas could bring cancer in humans.
Both drinks are sugar-free, however the newly promoted version "Zero" brings a sweetener component completely banned by the FDA to be harmful to health. After
surfeit consumers who have suffered so much publicity before summer by Coca Cola for its new product "Zero", come the medical opinions of specialists and the "goodness" or not, the new drink that promises zero tail sugar and an implicit "social success" to all who drink, produced by well-designed advertising materials used in the defendant's release brew.
Consumers are asked to meet the new Coca sister line: What difference has the Zero to Diet Coke? Is not that both lack of sugar in your composition?
Answers are on their labels reading the chemical composition of both: Coca Light has Acesulfame K (16mg /%) and aspartame (24mg /%), achieving a total of 40 mg/100% of drinking, while it is ZERO Sodium cyclamate (27mg%), Acesulfame K (15mg%) and aspartame (12 mg%) making it sweeter than the other (a total of 54 mg/100% of drink).
Given that the sweetener "Sodium cyclamate" is strictly prohibited by the FDA (the body than food control U.S. drug and American) to have demonstrable effects on the generation of cancerous tumors, and cyclamate (U $ S 10 per Kilo) is much cheaper than aspartame (U $ S 152 per Kilo), what Coca Cola will take from now on?
CYCLAMATE:
Cyclamate is the common name of ciclohexilsulfamato.
Expressed in the food industry with the letters E 952. Carcinogenic effects were initially attributed to cyclamate and cyclohexylamine (its main metabolite). Cyclamate is illegal in the U.S. (1969), Britain (1970), France and Japan, but now is an additive approved by the European parliament, with restrictions. Cyclamate is widely used in food and pharmaceutical industry as a sweetener. The maximum daily intake (current) is 7 mg (prior to 2005 11mg) / kg body weight. This substance was first synthesized in 1937, and used as artificial sweetener since 1950. Since 1970, suspecting that it could act as cancer and mutations producer, has banned its use as a food additive in many countries including USA, Japan, England and France. Is 50 times sweeter than sucrose and has a nasty aftertaste that disappears when using mixed with saccharin.
is very stable and not affected by the acidity and warming. Their use is fundamental
in carbonated beverages. Can also be used in yogurts sweetened
and as a tabletop sweetener. Cyclamate as such is less water soluble salts, which are commonly used.
Cyclamate is not considered universally safe food additive. Papers have been published indicating that, in experimental animals, high doses of this substance acts as a carcinogen and teratogen, which means it produces birth defects.
have also been reported other harmful effects caused by ingesting a massive dose, such as elevated blood pressure or production testicular atrophy. The data about its possible carcinogenicity are conflicting. The carcinogenic effect would not be due to the very cyclamate, but a product derived from it, cyclohexylamine, which carcinogenicity is not yet fully clarified.
The human body is not able to convert cyclamate in this derivative, but the bacterial flora in the gut. The degree of transformation depends very much on individuals, as well as varying the magnitude of the potential risk
PD
...." I hope they are useful to all and to be determined which are being taken by God, unfortunately we live in a world where brands are first cuidense life so much.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)