How Much Would Real Pearl Be?

ARGENTINA

At PJ of all political parties.



Morality is a matter of choice, we can choose a nice moral or virtuous, but we can not avoid its consecuenciasque are our own destruction.



He prefers nice ideas, to certain ideas, misconceptions about this predicament are both around us and not just for some people, but for most of them. In newspapers, on radio, in schools and universities all over the error is predominant and is Safe and comfortably tucked away in public opinion is on their side .

Potato Chips Brand Names

two Constitutions, two stories.

The Constitution is a moral code would restrict human nature that succeeds in changing human behavior to bring out the cooperation, peace and progress and develop civilization. Its source is objectivism that is born of the observation of the unintended consequences of human action.

The 1853 Constitution was the product of Christianity and its interpretation by the School of Salamanca in the fifteenth century and Scottish School in the eighteenth century.

His main concern was the relationship between individual freedom and the coercive power of government, so government powers were delegated, enumerated and thus limited. Government authority was transferred by the citizens, who in theory could recover.

The Constitution clearly defines the limits of the law and the Bill of Rights in the Constitution of 1853 provides only the rights of the individual face to face with the state.

The law was above the law because the law is often guided by the whims and fancies of those who hold political power.

From Athens all the great political thinkers were the essence of freedom, in which the individual is subject only a set of moral rules, law, and not to the will of a ruler.

The rule of law, the Government of IAW Not of men or of wiil and the Government under the IAW refer to the concept of law is only meaningful when we relate to law, but law loses its meaning when translated as law.

Unfortunately in the twentieth century this objectivist suffered a dramatic, though well intentioned-mutation into subjectivism.
Faith in reason was the illustration that the constitution gave rise to become the product of rational construction of the intellectual as intellectual fashion of the time, strength of different historical interests and concerns of their authors.

The modern rationalism has no doubt that the reason is also able to create a new language than inherited. So was poisoned our language as the words become meaningless, "as Confucius observed the people lose their freedom.

The term that most contributed to the loss of individual freedom was the social adjective to the noun was able to transform into its opposite.

So if Constitution is the set of moral rules aimed at limiting human nature to change their behavior to achieve cooperation peace and progress and thus bring out the civilization. Social Constitution is the set of moral standards aimed at freeing human nature free of human behavior and so does poverty, violence and barbarism to surface.

In this way the modern positivism does the word Justice, Law and Order adjective suffer from social influence of a dramatic mutation in the twentieth century.

social constitutions of 1949-57y94 was the result of social engineering socialism of the Social Doctrine of the Catholic Church and the welfare state of the twentieth century.

His goal was to design a more democratic Argentina, "closer to the citizens." Such efforts to achieve this goal have been thwarted by issues of more diverse and the result was that the new constitution had very negative implications for individual freedom, for justice, for the law, peace and progress.

Social constitution away instead of bringing government closer to citizens. Increase state power and its operations and streamlined bureaucracy instead became increasingly complex.
His laws rose to 25 thousand, many contradictory policies and obeying the vagaries of intellectual fashion of the moment, and increased regulations ad infinitum.

ignoring Social constitution limiting the powers of government for reasons both practical and ideological. Ideologically, the social constitution believes the government should initiate action, why not support a government limited by individual freedom.
By contrast, the Argentine Constitution of 1853 saw the government as a facilitator of actions initiated by private individuals. Thus, individualism is incompatible with the welfare state.

This is the reason why the social constitution is accepted by his good intentions and turns on the road to stagnation, violence and hell of barbarism. However
the social consequences of the constitution are seen as alien to the Constitution itself.

government powers that were supposedly limited,-through-unwanted effects are completely disjointed generating unlimited governments that destroy individual freedoms. The laws are above the law. That is the will of the ruler has no limits.

social constitution drafters made a conscious decision to leave as ambiguous as possible the scope of the federal government, so as to allow for expansion of central power and the consequent destruction of federalism and the corresponding induction tyranny.

Thanks to the language of modern rationalism poisoned the social constitution is full of vague politically correct phraseology, including references to "sustainable development", "solidarity between generations" and "social market economy."

Social constitution also seeks to codify the "social rights", ie the rights that individuals or groups claiming it to other groups or individuals. Good examples of this are referred to as the right to decent employment or housing, which can only be guaranteed with the transfer of large resources of some citizens to other citizens.

The Declaration of Rights of the Constitution of 1853 stipulated only the rights of the individual face to face with the state. There was nothing about the rights that citizens have some property of others.
L clear limits of the law you were deleted creating an ambiguous space for so-called social rights, the Constitution lost its limits.

With the adoption of the social constitution of 1949-94 are born well-meaning social rights that would become the ideal tool for citizens to influence (political, bureaucratic politics and business friends) achieved a life and a living wage. Citizens are not influential (Workers and employers) must pay the tax impossible and a great legal uncertainty, which causes a lack of investment, the closure of their companies and the corresponding mass unemployment. Also achieved by this means the corruption of our political class and a negative effect on economic growth that leads to the stress of civilization with which human groups began his self-destructive process.

In this way, the Constitution suffers a devaluation by the broken promises, while Argentina's economy relegated to a secondary position, postponing indefinitely the dream of becoming a great country. Our

intellectuals believed that their work was superior and more evolved and compared favorably with those of the Constitutional Convention of 1853. Social engineers developed confuse their constitutional design on the simple yet enlightened principles underlying the Constitution of 1853 which underpinned the success of Argentina at the beginning of the century.

A constitution that is not practicable becomes an excuse for any practice.

A moral constitution (practicable) produces moral laws and build a moral nation, able to secure justice and hence the creation of cooperation, peace and progress and civilization develops.
By contrast the constitutions built based on a morality-based utopian ideologies nice (but not practicable) - produce immoral laws, which when executed create new imbalances, which generate more than building a country immoral laws immoral.
These laws destroy freedom and justice dismantle ending becoming an appendage of central government.

These two Constitutions reflect two very different performance of conflicting moral consequences.

The constitution contrary to the beliefs of modern intellectuals should not evolve because they refer to human nature and the human condition is immutable.
U.S.
based all his success, contrary to what they represent-not democracy but maintaining its inhalterable constitution that was away from criticism of modern intellectuals.

Today the European Union, Latin America paicas 6 and 16 provinces in Argentina, based on the failure of their own constitutions-seeking social reform and deepen his social reforms.

Is not it time to recognize the error produced by the Fatal Conceit of our intellectuals and return to the moral constitution of 1853?.

The Procedure Of Need Analysis

PROLOGUE: Unfortunately Alberdi was right.

The central thesis of this paper is based on demonstrating that the Constitution is a moral code that has a direct effect on the legal and institutional order of a country, and this order impact on economic progress and coexistence peaceful.

The Constitution of 1853 did the rise of Argentina and represented "policy honesty." The reform of 1949 opened the door to moral relativism causing the stagnation of the country and the beginning of what Alberdi called "double policy of working-class crooks" , which continued to 1994 reform achieving legal and institutional mess that marked the final decline and led the country to barbarism in which we operate today.

Alberdi deepen thinking on four aspects:

1) That in the universities was developing a new breed, I call the Barbarians Illustrated, which posed a threat to progress and peaceful coexistence. Interpret the natural tendency of the intellectuals who work for the marketplace of ideas, earn higher profits welcome ideas, that certain ideas. These intellectuals developed systems designed to give moral frameworks, which are those that ensure peace and progress-so pretext of liberating man from the uncomfortable obligation

2) Criticism of Alberdi the Greco-Roman concept of motherland and patriotism as a threat to individual rights.

3) The order of Alberdi future policy of maintaining unchanged its Constitution as a prerequisite for continued peace and progress. And submit the consequences it had for Argentina to change our moral code, based on constitutional reforms that followed the 1853.

4) Alberdi's mistrust of the risks of democracy due to the natural tendency of the majority's power to amend its Constitution, which damages the rule of law and then end with the Republic and federalism.

Alberdi's predictions were met in full.

The lack of clarity in these concepts achievement Argentine intellectuals despise and forget to Alberdi, who was the greatest intellectual of the nineteenth century and this led to the destruction of the Constitution making legal and institutional chaos that endure today country.

I hope that this essay brings clarity and strengthen the argument get started in "basis and starting point for the National Organization" to republish the only true revolution that had the Argentines, May 1, l853.

Veronika Moser Movies

INTRODUCTION: THE REPUBLIC WILL NOT BE LOST

From boy caught my attention twice Moral sense and the clear contradiction between words and deeds of those who called themselves moralists.

Moral Behind the always hid under stress they did succumb once again and good wishes of those in power.

In the 70's rocked by terrorism, political power collapsed once again in our country and the main opposition leader declared incompetent I have no solution . And step-opened once again, to the armed forces to reorganize the country and disorders violence generated by democratically elected governments.

The self-proclaimed Military Reserve Moral de la Patria, to save it from destruction in the hands of international terrorism could not prevent the triumph within its own ranks of the moral interventionist all crimes committed under the rule.

In the 80's, two documentaries, "The Lost Republic I" and "The Lost Republic II," taught us that to blame all our ills was the absence of Democracy.

won the election who had raised the banner of the Radical Ethics and the premise that "democracy With the priest, democracy education, democracy to come."

A couple of years after leaving his office plunged the country into a self-destructive process that he called " Lebanonization" with utilities and totally collapsed amid a corruption and hyperinflation lightning-unprecedented in the history of Argentina- . In his flight only heard him say: "I did not know, I did not, I could not."

The chaos caused in the 80 opened in the 90's, the doors to a state reform in the area of \u200b\u200bpublic services and on behalf of "Privatization" national monopolies were transferred to foreign monopolies or private monopolies, giving friends captive markets to dealers.

On behalf of the "State Reform" was followed by increasing government spending, taxes and government borrowing to increase the looting of the population. On behalf of the "Republican Principles", was completed with the independence of the judiciary and what little remained of Federalism and the Republic. On behalf of the "Ethics" is followed by bribing and corrupting officials, legislators and judges, and there was a Constitutional reform ensuring the strength of the new oligarchs in the political parties, and finished with our moral code - the 1853 constitution - which had achieved great Milagro Argentino.

On behalf of the "Free Market" is used the power of the public for the realization of racketeering in government offices themselves. On behalf of the "Freedom of the Press" public funds were handled advertising as a means of extortion to the press, which often took bribes to cover political affairs, and others associated with politicians.

In 2000, to end the moral interventionist Justicialist radical ethics had another chance but behind its great principles of equality and the Welfare State, remained the same actors, the same vices, the same abuses and corruption itself.

assumed the government promising to lower taxes and his first act was to increase them. This time people did not give them time to flee to the ease with which they had before.

At this point the word moral in the mouth of a politician produced in me a terrible suspicion. Argentina

The tragedy is by not having options when voting. Political parties - that meet all the moral interventionist - have become bands who want to grab the cash - tax revenues - to experience the fruit of the work of others (theft).

The new policy proposals are old, new and renewed promises of new moral contract "interventionist", but promises of equality, or more liberal disguised right crouched waiting for the opportunity to commit further abuses against the people.

The country has more than 1200 political parties and all respond to the ethical interventionist Democrat PJ. Today no political party flying republican principles and ethics of freedom.

Democracy is a necessary but not sufficient. After 20 years of democracy, the error is in sight, has only served for the realization of the largest frauds against the common good of society, which is the rule of law.

also try to show that, for democracy not to fail, must be framed within the moral context of a constitution like the U.S. - which is the result of a long evolutionary process of mankind's struggle to conquer their own freedom - as the fulfillment of it, leads to the strengthening of the Republic, with its most important consequences as they are, the limit state power and the preservation of individual freedom necessary to achieve progress and peaceful coexistence, essential for sustain a better world.

The ultimate goal is to contribute to the formation of intellectual leaders who are prepared to meet the ever deceitful ways of politics, to resist the blandishments of power and influence and who are willing to work for a moral and political ideal that ensures individual freedom and individual rights.

Politics is the only human activity which is not needed any training.

The results are clear: 20 years of democracy we confirmed that only with democracy is not enough, and that this may be the easiest way to barbarism.

royalty Democracy individual becomes the right of the majority to attack the minority and this is the State of Nature or Barbarism that today we are walking.

Democracy is a very important tool that does just that we can remove a tyrant without spilling a single drop of blood. But we do not guarantee anything else.

La Republica, individual freedoms and the stage of law will always check by the power of the majority. Politics being

often sound counter-intuitive and against our goal is to recognize it, for better understanding of the need to conform to moral frameworks, which is always in human nature and try to avoid pretext to try to improve morale seek to achieve a pleasant and virtuous.

This character of the policy that achieves the best intentions are transformed over and over again on the road to hell.

need the training of political leaders who understand the importance of moral frameworks, individual liberty, property and pursuit of happiness itself embodied in the Constitution of 1853 and subsequent amendments denatured - know how to defend, respect and oppose the fatal arrogance of the intellectuals - I always try new construction rationalist - that denature the climate necessary to develop the Comprehensive Cooperation Order Humana (so-called capitalism) is what assures us that humanity in its broadest diversity, can satisfy the ever increasing demands of an increasingly large population.

The importance of this issue is crucial not only for progress but for peaceful coexistence, since the natural tendency of man to interventionist policies, which work so well in small communities but that inhibit the development of extensive partnerships and the appearance of the wide array of human cooperation - has led in the twentieth century to situations of extreme tension, which resulted in the most horrendous massacres, of which history had no record and that, as we begin XXI century, could lead to new and unpredictable modern holocaust. For these reasons

Argentina and Latin America are a boiler to explode and the Union (Socialist Republics) Union is preparing for a collapse similar to that of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

The losers of the world must join this intellectual struggle, since the difference between one system and another is the quality of life of the poor, the rich and politicians live well on all systems.

For this reason it must constantly harping on these topics at universities and in public opinion to end the dangerous crisis we and that, once overcome, will not happen again.

The objectives of this study are:

1) To analyze the correlation between morality, economic performance and a proper constitution.

2) To investigate the principles governing the development, progress and decline of human societies.
3) Analyze the U.S. failure to demand democracy for the future just better, not realizing that the key to its success lies more in keeping to the letter of his unalterable Founder Constitution, that in a democracy.

Naruto Doujinshi Futanari

Justicialism BEEN A MISTAKE?

PJ's conception is at once grandiose and simple. Of fact be considered one of the most ambitious creations of the mind. Something so bold and daring that has been justifiably raise the most exalted admiration. If we save our country from barbarism, far from ignoring the arguments PJ contemptuously, it must be refuted.

In the first human settlements threats from neighboring groups - attacking killing and enslaving the men and stealing the wealth and women of the vanquished - the concept of freedom generated group, based on the independence and security, strengthened by the concept of motherland and patriotism.

The concept of justice Plato is " that serves the interests of the state."

invasion, conquest and stealing the neighbor was until recently the only way of generating wealth.

As societies evolved and increased in number, trade relations, with the help of the division of labor, make it through the assault on human cooperation.

The concept of justice evolves into what Ulpian defined as "giving each his own" hand of the evolution of the concept of freedom, which becomes detached and is defined as the possibility of free disposal of fruits of our labor.

The concept of ownership with all power and new concepts of justice and individual freedom, are the rule of law, and this helps produce the Industrial Revolution in England and poorly governed humanity out of the Middle Ages.

Argentina thanks to the 1853 Constitution does incorporate these concepts and thus born 1853-1949 Argentine Miracle a project based on what could be synthesized in full respect for the free disposal of the fruit of our work is to freedom individual and property.

The poor and uneducated arrivals from around the world - mainly fleeing European barbarism - there were then the possibility of owning the fruits of their labor and become rich quickly.

These new moral frameworks - generators of wealth - clearly show which are "the blessings of liberty" announcing the preamble of the Constitution. Alberdi

can transform a society of rich rulers poor subjects, a society with a government austere and wealthy citizens.

"God is Argentine" sums up the incredible growth that places - in no time - to the poorest of the English Colonies as the 6th world power.

Another generation of Argentines, influenced by the concept of freedom and equality of the French Revolution introduced the exciting concept of social justice seemed to be a new evolution of the concept of justice.

Based on the experiences of the first French Revolution and Marxism after Popper makes it clear that "pursuing equal first thing you lose is the freedom and liberty once lost nor can equality and non-free" .

Hayek Then discover other confusion about the double meaning of equality, and lets us know that " is a big difference between treating people equally and attempting to make them equal. While the former is condition of a free society, the latter implies a new form of slavery "

The modern rationalism was poisoned our language as the words become meaningless," as Confucius day people are losing their freedom.

The term that most contributed to the loss of individual freedom was the social adjective to the noun was able to transform into its opposite. Thus, if Justice is to each his own, Social Justice means get about the fruit of his work to give to others, in this way becomes the ideological support for the legalization of theft.

Also if law is the set of rules protecting individual freedom and is manifested by abstract codes consisting essentially of negative-law prohibitions that prevent the man to interfere in the sphere of other equally protected; is Social Rights the set of rules that is manifested by specific codes, laws, consisting essentially of permits "positive law, which allows man to interfere in the sphere of others. Abandoning this way individual liberty. Taking the Right to an immoral and absurd situation in which it is located.

1930, the fascinating concept of Social Justice - How well it works in very small communities - takes over the heart of Argentine Universities paving the way for what Alberdi dubbed the "Barbarism Illustrated" and so begins to blur the rule of law. The new intellectuals

formed in this climate permeated with good intentions are genuine ignoramuses - as they know things that are very nice but that are not true - and their role as legislators, politicians, judges and trial lawyers were able to finish - in very short time - with the rule of law in Argentina, beginning his road to barbarism. We

that way to weaken protection of individual freedom and state intervention achieves the resulting absence of limits to power.

This opened the way for the creation of the Ministry of Economy from where it can and should lead the market. Each intervention in the market means injury to rights of third parties with which the Minister of Economics will become not only a nuisance but a real danger manifest, to the extent that each step taken by the bureaucrat weakening the already degraded rule of law.

So central intervention in the market would lead to the ruin of the left and interventional systems Right generating enormous stress. Perhaps one of the greatest contributions that economists have made to mankind in the twentieth century is the factual demonstration that the command economy extensive intervention by the state is counterproductive in any scale.

of these interesting, but confusing ideas, born PJ, ruling the country for the past 70 years, sometimes with fibula.

theft of neighbor returns to center stage, first stagnation, poverty and violence then its results. Now occupies the 2 nd place in the world, but now in the ranking of most corrupt countries.

Argentina is today a fascinating and dangerous example of the Middle Ages in the XXI Century.

With Justice - sustained on the merits or necessity and not freely available to the fruit of our work - we are back to square one: governments rich, with a poor people.

Plaza de Mayo has been for the past 70 years, the scene of a people crying out for justice.

The Supreme Court surrounded - like the other branches of government - and the levels of poverty, injustice and violence reached, give clear indication of the magnitude of the disaster made in Argentina, with the new concept of justice. We must learn from

Argentina's tragedy, which for good and noble our intentions, if not respect the rule of law - justice and individual freedom - ever produced tremendous damage, especially to those most in trying to help.

What Tablets Do You Take For Chest Infection

MORAL CONSTITUTION AND RELIGION. The moral character of

"We live in a civilized society because we have to assume, unintentionally, certain habits inherited from the fundamentally moral, many of which have been always unwelcome to the human being - and on the validity and intrinsic efficiency knew nothing - ". FA Hayek, 1990.

The Constitution of a country is an instrument of purely moral character. But morality is not the result of human design, but rather the result of observation of the unintended consequences of human action.

"The moral standards are no conclusions from reason." D. Hume (Treatise)

Man, throughout its evolution has acted driven by instinct and reason, however, both instinct and reason to overcome the limitations encountered various problems encountered.

The observation of the consequences of their instinctive action was unintentionally creating a set of moral standards aimed at modifying their behavior to avoid unwanted consequences of their actions instinctive.

superstitions, taboos and myths were formed by observing the consequences, unintended, of human action and laid the groundwork for the seat of more complex civilizations.

"superstition did a great service to humanity. It gave people a reason - a bad reason, it is true - for good action, and surely it is better for the world than men to behave properly even false motives to obey it, however, adopt a bad behavior inspired best intentions. What affects the behavior of society is not the opinion. Provided that our actions are fair and correct, it hardly matters to others that our views are wrong. " Sir James Frazer Psyche 's Task (1909)

Aristotle in Nicomachean Ethics argues that happiness consists in the habit of living well and doing good, ie the possession of virtue, morality is derived from good thinking (of virtue) is what to do - induces positive law - but the moral is what we DO NOT do - induces negative right - to avoid unintended consequences of human action. Conception is antagonistic to each other.

inherited morality or tradition is a complex set of experiences - personal stories - perfected over time through an evolutionary process of correction and adjustment, based on the right is negative and shows us what not to do.

This is a very intense and difficult task that no human genius, more encompassing, can be done with the help of reason or reflection. His field of work is the experience of the unintended consequences of human action (the story).

Under the influence of Aristotle, Descartes first and then the modern rationalism not only discards the moral legacy, but not hesitate to say that reason is able to create a new legal order.

Since the late nineteenth century and the advent of the Universities mass popularized the idea that the reason we could build a new moral order than inherited, based on virtue and good thought.

schisms produced in the hard sciences, the heliocentric quantum physics first and then gave land to the inherited knowledge of the geocentric and Newtonian physics - which until then explained all phenomena -.

This contributed to a growing mistrust on the inherited knowledge, and strengthened the idea that reason would find new cures to old problems.

Morality is the difference between life and death.

The moral life is correct, leads to success, progress and peaceful coexistence.

The death is morally wrong leads to failure, stagnation, poverty and violence ultimately self-destruction.

Man is free to choose a nice moral or virtuous - but incorrect - but not free to avoid the consequences are their own destruction.

George Orwell says " doublethink means being able to keep in mind two opposing ideas simultaneously and accept both" . This is lack of clarity and reason for inconsistent attitudes.

If being aware of this contradiction, we use one or another speech at your convenience according to the occasion, this is double standards. The first is an error, the second is intellectual irresponsibility which undermines and destroys the common sense reason.

This is moral relativism, a philosophy consistent with the thesis that all the arguments are more or less equally defensible. From the intellectual point of view: anything goes!

relativism and leads to anarchy, lawlessness and violence.

As we shall see later, the nineteenth century was a generator of new construction moral and these led to humanity in the century after its largest Holocaust with over 180 million people.

Argentina is the demonstration of a country having adopted a moral right (1853), decided to change to get to the intellectual fashion (1949-1994), changing its course towards its own destruction.

And this is a lesson to be learned: no civilization can be taken for granted.

Your stay can never be considered fixed, there will always be a dark age waiting just around the corner.

pleasant ideas are dangerous and lead to death, certain ideas are often not pleasant but lead us to success are life.

This is the biggest challenge of democracy, of course people will tend always welcome ideas over the true.

From this derives the need for shelter and the Moral Constitution of the Republic as a means of limiting the natural overflow of who holds power.

Real Masterbationin Women

from polytheism to monotheism

Xenophanes (700 BC) - the first critic of History - censorship corruption of the Greek gods, these inflate the human passions. "Revenge is the pleasure of the Gods " derived human conflict in violent acts, the companies found a limit and this prevented them from increasing their population.

"The fact that greatly affects the prosperity .... is the increase in population." Adam Smith.

societies advanced policies much in the different levels of ideas, science, technology and art, due to its open condition.

"The truth is objective, even when standing on it will not be able to recognize" . Xenophanes

The nature of the human mind demands certainties, absolutes, man seeks attain certain knowledge and need to be at peace with his conscience.

"The saints who realized the revelation that only men could give absolute certainty, they were right. " Ludwig von Mises .

In Exodus 32, Moses down from Mount Sinai and its people find a new process involved in self-destructive, he said, "Who esaa the Lord's side? Who would you join me ..... And I said Thus says Yahweh, the God of Israel; Stick every man his sword to the thigh and review .... pass over the camp from one to the other door and kill every man his brother, his friend, his kinsman ... " And died that day half of the people.

After a while down again Moses from Mount Sinai, tables bringing the 10 Commandments, which were the first moral code (the first Constitution). Birth of revealed truth, monotheism was born.

"But also how these commandments are supposed to emanate from a superhuman authority, human thought has no right to intervene. It would be a contradiction to attribute such an origin and to allow the critic." Durkheim E .

The man's attempt to return to unleash their natural instincts and get rid of the heavy moral standards, was a recurring theme in history, like rain in nature.

religion imposes on its believers a comprehensive program of dogmas and practices being present in all life circumstances temporary. E. Durkheim.

superhuman authority, coupled with the extensive range of practices and dogmas gave man and seized absolute certainties reluctant to end the trend of abandonment of moral standards. Social groups who adhered to this strategy is imposed on others by its greater cohesion and this allowed them to grow in number.

This important benefit, brought with it two negative effects: the first was the abandonment of the Open Society and birth - under special circumstances - religious fanaticism. Now the truth is subjective and relies on the superhuman authority or his agent or interpreter.

The second negative effect was that the moral standards by limiting human instincts, created in man a great contradiction between his mind and body. The prayer was the most appropriate tool to achieve through the mind, the mastery of human passions.

"Make a man cut in two and a half faced against each other. I do taught that their body and consciousness are intertwined enemies in a deadly struggle, two antagonists of opposite natures, contradictory claims, incompatible needs, that is harm to benefit one another, that his soul belongs to a supernatural realm, but his body evil is a prison that keeps you in bondage in this land; and that good is beating the body, to undermine it by years of patient struggle, digging a path to the exit that leads to glorious freedom of the grave " A. Rand's "Atlas Shrugged."

Religions are the guardians of moral standards, the churches work on the limits of reason and now have the challenge of harmonizing the resurgence of the Open Society accompanying and watching the miracles of science, while accompany man in the reconciliation between mind and body. Because

"Happiness is a state of non-contradictory joy, a joy without penalty or guilt, a joy that does not conflict with any of your values and that leads to your own destruction. " A. Rand

Cost Lumineers Mexico

The 10 Commandments. THE FIRST CONSTITUTION Monotheism

Man is a predatory animal (inclined to theft or robbery).

The ownership is affected by predatory instinct, the commandment "Do not steal" is to limit their natural instinct.

" The man could evolve, because he had the ability to limit their natural instincts." Hayek

The natural man is very similar to mono, civilized man is a man on moral grounds designed artificial. The moral norm "not to covet the goods of others and do not steal," begins to emerge property rights.

"No civilized society that values \u200b\u200bthe property would dare challenge the plural, the history of the two are intimately linked. Henry Sumner Maine

kill, steal, do not respect their elders, to desire your neighbor's wife , etc. and these unfortunate tendencies spring from the very nature of man, of that feeling primitive, universal and invincible that pushes him to the pursuit of pleasure, well being and survival, and away from discomfort, effort and pain.

This is the man in his natural state. The moral standards by limiting their natural instincts the first steps to achieve peaceful coexistence and increasing population, opening the way to the emergence of civilization.

Retirement Homes Portland Oregon Volunteer

Judaism opens " The Age of Father", the moral is the moral interventionist or war, it aims to ensure the survival of the group of self-destructive internal and external threats, these objectives are achieved successfully.

While there are external threats, always emerge in the heart of civilized society morality of war - from the age of the Father - in order to overcome the danger.

" the Jews start all wars " Woody Allen

Morality of the Age of the Father, crispa relations with neighbors and leads to conflict.

* * *

Christianity opened "The Age of the Son", this evolution was characterized by the development of three new fundamental moral principles, that would achieve the appearance of individual liberties.

1) " Love your neighbor as yourself" leads to individualism and respect for others (in the sense of near and foreign) induces respect and tolerance among individuals and among peoples.

2) "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God" separates and raises a wall between church and state.

3) " The just man sins seven times recognizes the fallibility of human nature, the intellectual well-meaning is wrong - recognizes the limits of reason -. And they also recognize the limits of clericalism.

These three moral foundations, they are not able to establish itself as the other 10 existing commands, as these can only emerge in situations of sustained peace.

the policy instrument that embodied these moral principles, it was in 1787 the U.S. Constitution - these moral foundations of Christianity achieved exceptional destination within the U.S. has community of nations - and 66 years after Argentina's Constitution incorporates these three basic moral achieved in 1853, a result similar to that achieved in the U.S..

"Christian morality does not need one thing to complete the conquest of the world: the desarmeis of any instrument of violence and to let her natural weapons, which are freedom, persuasion, beauty. Conquering the conquerors of the world, Christianity has proven to be the moral of free men, because men have found in it the expression and the formula of their native instincts of freedom "Alberdi

To understand the miracle happened in these lands by Christian ethics, they coined the expression "God is Argentine."

" In the Church of Rome for hundreds of years, committed acts at odds with the humanism that were known and accepted by all - the status of women, persecution of the Jews, massacres of the Crusades, the Inquisition, the Conquest of America, etc.. - The anti-humanism is anti-Christian. " Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (Jubilee 2000). Thanks

moral relativism, the history is full of unwanted effects for just causes. When John Paul II in a remarkable display of courage and independence of mind, he apologized on behalf the damage done in the name of the Church, refers to the absence of Christianity.

In the Age of the Son of Christianity, it happens the Holy Spirit was to be addressed in paragraph HISTORY AS LEARNING

Catholicism increasingly tense conflict in its geography - by reason of the moral interventionist - involution the Age of the Father and could not complete its evolution into Christianity. With the apology of 2000 begins its march to become a true Christian Church, helping to shape the three principles of Christianity in all its geography.

These issues may explain why, in American geography Churches are filled and geography Catholic churches are empty.

* * *
moral relativism does
men who misinterpret the meaning of religion.

surrender their reason and free will to follow blindly the leader of the moment is Tyrant, Fhürer, priest or imam.

For them God is not self-seeking human perfection through continuous efforts to understand the world.

Instead of seeking the meaning of transcendence and improved human beings, they give themselves, and repeated what the priest tells them to think and do.

not believe in the Christian principle " help yourself and God will help " take refuge in the comfortable attitude of asking God to do everything for them.

misunderstand religion as an exogenous dependence makes fans dependent on a leader and this makes them irresponsible puppets and a public danger.

need an alter ego to fill all the spaces of their own ego.

a greater or lesser degree, all have something about this because we were brought up in this confusion, moral values \u200b\u200band shifts interventionist destroying the moral foundations of freedom that our founding fathers designed.

Ap Bio 5 Why Water Moved Into Respirometer

THE EVOLUTION OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND ARGENTINA, 1853

By 1750, Adam Smith noted that in Glasgow and Edinburgh there were situations of growing wealth and prosperity. This situation improved quality of life of all members of the city and contributed to the peaceful coexistence of its people. Increased trade, and human cooperation could impact almost "magical" (which he called "the invisible hand " ) which enhanced the growth and prosperity, contributing to development in the most diverse branches of human endeavor. On the other hand a few miles away in the Scottish Highlands as they lived in the Middle Ages, situations of great suffering, and standstill barbarism contrasted with a prosperous and peaceful world of Scottish cities.

Why do some Scots were prosperous, rich, peaceful and civilized and the other poor, stagnant, violent and barbaric?

Adam Smith recognized that the strengthening of property law and respect for contracts, (rule of law) would be the cause of the difference. They were laying the groundwork for what would be the Industrial Revolution and a new opportunity for progress of civilization.

The Constitution of the USA and Argentina in 1853 had a similar origin for their moral character issued by the experience of the consequences of Human Action inherited from the English tradition and guided by the moral foundations that brought Christianity and that developed at the School of Salamanca.

Submission to these standards has allowed the U.S. to be the engine of civilization and humanity out of extreme situations. Manages to end the killings and large-scale famine, the population began to increase worldwide because people stopped dying like flies.

" The unintended, reluctant, even painful subjection of human beings to such standards to those environments provided the necessary social cohesion through which its members agreed to a superior level of comfort and knowledge of different species, enabling them "Multiply and replenish the earth people" (Genesis I, 28). " Hayek 1990.

For Americans, the Constitution is a sacred character comparable to the 10 commandments and managed to get her away from human criticism like what Moses had been the first man's moral code.

In contrast the Constitutions which have emanated as a result of the desire for the good of the intelligentsia have been a more and more situations of stagnation, frustration and failure, leading to peoples situations of "strain of civilization" that resulted in self-destructive processes or Barbarism.

On one occasion the President of Gaulle warned his Minister André Malreux: "France only makes reforms through revolutions So since the French Revolution - in the name of freedom of deaths caused twice the entire history of the Inquisition - he had 13 schemes until 1959. Among them, three revolutions (1789, 1830 and 1848), two empires, Restoration, five republics, the Paris Commune of 1871 (political power created from the extinction of the state) and a stage similar to the civil war ( 1944/1945). He also participated in the twentieth century of two world wars and supported several genocides such as Algeria.

In 2005 French tried once again to join a new constitution rationalistic, European, with the same vices that led to his long litany of errors.

Argentine Lawmakers newly minted, in trying to free itself from unwelcome and painful submission human being with moral norms, they set out to design a nice rational moral - based on the principles of the French Revolution - this so, have produced a distortion of the Constitution of 1853, causing as a result an immoral Constitution (1949.1957 and 1994) that generates immoral laws and build a country immoral. Argentina is 70 years in the footsteps of France same results.

The 10 commandments as the Constitution right - the U.S. in 1853 or - no need to evolve, since they refer to human nature, which is one and immutable, and although the man is formed by the process education and civilization, human nature in man always survives.

man is hard to perceive the relationship between the violation of moral norms and their effects because they occur after a time that naive mind fails to perceive and relate.

Ward Transpiration Lab Answers

FRUIT TREE OF WISDOM

Everything
explain below, contributes to focus attention on an issue that would leave immediately and explicitly express my opinion. Although I am critical of the alleged use of reason, which boast the most intellectual in any way like this could be considered a refusal on my part to reason correctly interpreted. And by "properly interpreted" I mean that recourse to it having a clear awareness of its inherent limitations, and that by accepting the logical consequences, the actor is displayed at all times willing to address this shocking reality-proven both in the field of economics as in biology - namely that a spontaneous order may be superior to any other that is the result of planned intervention of man. How could the writer of these lines to reject the use of reason, when it strives to show through it, the error is an interventionist ideal type as "factual and logical?

" The ideas of economists and political philosophers right or wrong, are more powerful than is generally assumed, in fact the world is mainly based on them." JMKeynes

* * *

Why the poorest of the English colonies, inhabited by illiterate immigrants who did not know speak the same language, became in a short time, in the 6th world power?

Why Abraham Lincoln, illiterate until the age of 19 and 9 months of formal education, was the greatest U.S. president?

What formal education were the men of the generation of 80, who managed the Argentine miracle?

Why Universitaria Argentina is the great disappointment of the late twentieth century in a very short time, transformed the country into one of the most unjust and corrupt in the world? Sarmiento

interpreted the difference between civilization and barbarism was given by educational attainment of its citizens and emphasized education, to consolidate the progress achieved.

Sarmiento Alberdi warned that men were more enlightened than himself Sarmiento, who set fire to Paris and that the universities was forming a new breed, which he called the Barbarians Illustrated. He also indicated that these could be transformed into a real danger to civilization and to the continued peace and progress.

* * *

Marx in the Communist Manifesto, the 10 points proposed for the destruction of what was dubbed capitalism - and Argentina met all - he says that education should be free, free and directed by the State.

was believed that the aim was to give equal opportunities, but the real objective was the spread of an ideology, to promote the omnipotence of the state and the consequent destruction of the rights and liberties.

To enable the socialist dream, the members of the intellectual elite should believe in this new religion, placing it as the dominant paradigm.

"Trust the State public education is an evil plot aimed at shaping the human mind, so that there is the slightest difference from one individual to another, the mold used for this purpose is the most pleasing to the regime prevailing political, ... to the extent that this task is performed correctly and effectively, a despotism is installed on the intelligence of men. "JS Mill

In communist countries, the intellectual elite of a high level and has been the basis for sustaining the social process.

These intellectuals are ignoramuses, and who know a lot of things that are not true and which are contrary to the nature of things and human nature.

is why we speak of the need for a new man - he is a man without his own nature, without passion, without feeling and without interest -. That man will never appear again.

" Because ignorance is located between true science and erroneous doctrines ... However, those without science are better off and more noble with his natural caution, arguing that those who rely on bad or wrong reason, rush on rules false and absurd general. Thomas Hobbes 1651.

* * *


The serpent convinces Eve to taste the forbidden fruit from the tree of wisdom.

Genesis 3.5: "Ye shall be as gods, knowing good and of evil ". Gen 3.11 Who told you you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree that I commanded you not to eat?
Adam and Eve after eating, actually assumed the office of God, who is judge of good and evil, but acquired no new ability to distinguish them directly. They were naked in rejecting its very nature - human fallibility - and were driven from Paradise.

So the tree of knowledge killed the tree of life.

* * *

Don Quixote syndrome

The knight was the owner of a huge intellectual, captured after a colorful flowery rhetoric, from which the noble knight fantastic fictions constructed that contrasted with the vision the reality of his squire.

A man - or country - is civilized when it manages to overcome the fiction that builds your mind and recognizes in nature fallible.

backward countries, are those who have not yet been able to leave the stage of superstition and Argentines believe we still Don Quixote.

So when we face a moralist gives us the feeling to be interacting with a parent who does not understand what we speak, as affected by the syndrome of Don Quixote, we construct a fiction from reality.

* * *

"Believe nothing of what your teachers tell you, just look how they act." Woody Allem

Popper tells us about the problem of knowledge swagger and danger that entails. Strike down on intellectuals who hide behind large and obscure words and sentence: " who has no ability to express clearly, is that simply does not yet have capacity."

Popper goes against the tendency to link Kant complex to the deep. This affected intellectuals such as Rousseau, Marx and Hegel, among others, and his ideas led to the most terrible suffering and holocausts of the twentieth century. Hayek

"The Fatal Conceit" and The Presumption of knowledge, shows how intellectuals - always well-intentioned but wrong - tried to build a new morality based on reason giving way to various schools of thought, that keep the intelligentsia in a confusion that was very well treated in the recent film "The Barbarian Invasions."

Philosophers who airs of wisdom and sufficiency have a tough task when dealing with people inquiring, that evictions of all the positions they take refuge, and that surely will lead eventually to a dangerous dilemma. The best way to avoid this confusion is to be modest in our claims, and even discover the difficulty before us is presented as an objection. Thus we can convert Somehow our ignorance into a kind of virtue. D. Hume

Perhaps the greatest contribution of philosophy is to confirm our human weakness, our limits and our blindness despite our efforts to conceal them and avoid them.

* * *

"Who runs the past manage the future and who runs this runs the past" 1984, George Orwell, 1948. In Argentina

only possible thanks to the uprooting similar decline in its history. Juan Bautista Alberdi - the greatest intellectual of the nineteenth century - was filed by historians trained in the decade of 30. That

new generation of Argentine intellectuals took over frameworks moral void created by Alberdi in the 1853 Constitution, which was the only true revolution that had the Argentines to begin the path of decay to this day. Alberdi

in 1880 warned of the dangers that threatened to Argentina and in that context spoke of how enlightened barbarism won the hearts of the Argentine Universities.

the new historians were born and new lawyers in their role as legislators, politicians, judges and trial lawyers would be responsible for completing in a short time with the rule of law in our country.



* * *
" Alpargatas if not books." Today, in light of the results obtained by misconceptions, we can give a new interpretation of the famous phrase of General Peron.


" just know that I know nothing and just that." Socratic maximum of 2400 years ago, teaches us that this is a recurring problem that is necessary for universities to be open-minded again and give up further (de) forming the city behind what Ortega y Gasett call "the barbarism of specialization. "

How To Create Limberjack

The Barbarian Invasions

Europe's history was dominated - until recently - by the constant invasion of people to their neighbors. This created a permanent state of war throughout Europe. With the discovery of America, theft and looting came to this land. The only generators of wealth were - until recently - stealing a neighbor produced by the barbarian invaders.

This phenomenon was interrupted for periods of time where civilization made its way making some progress, which again and again succumbed to a new invasion.

Since the birth of the United Provinces of South conflict was a cluster that generates moral poverty - a tradition inherited from English - deliver religious intolerance, political violence, injustice, poverty, chaos and anarchy.

May Revolution of Independence first and then trying to distance himself from these moral frameworks, and it was only in 1853 that thanks to the incredible action of the binomial Alberdi-Urquiza, manages to achieve the dream of our forefathers to join civilization incorporating moral frameworks respect the property. Birth of the Constitution of 1853 that achieved in a few years to bring to the poorest of the English colonies to a privileged place in the comity of nations and end abruptly with a violent past.

The consequence was that we the hatred of foreigners, to open the doors to immigration, religious intolerance to religious freedom - 100 years before Europe - the degradation of work with respect for individual rights, affirmed the property rights and this led to peace, order and progress sustained for over 75 years. Wonder
caused to the world the results for freedom - individual - as part of the mix of peoples and Latin cultures. To the point that Argentina recently exceeded the GDP of the European average.
The blessings of liberty (individual) that anticipated the preamble of the Constitution were bearing fruit. On this occasion, to explain the effect "magic" caused by the consolidation of ownership was called "The Argentine miracle." The growth was so fast and strong he was supposed to not to abandon this new tradition, Argentina would beat even the late twentieth century to the U.S..
The American Dream also made its way south of the continent.

But something happened. The old tradition made its way and was returning to the heart of the Argentines. Thus militarism, bureaucracy, clergy and moved to the culture of work and freedom. Every step became weaker property rights, undermining individual rights.

recurrence morality of war and hatred abroad, resulting among other things an armed conflict with our fellow Chileans. Later, an unusual war against the British Empire tried to take revenge for Trafalgar.

Holy Inquisition also had a triumphant return, with the kidnapping, torture and disappearances.

The old moral interventionist poverty generating reconquered the scene. Alberdi in 1880 in his "The omnipotence of the state is the Denial of Individual Rights" shows, clearly, his concern for this issue. And 150 years ahead in understanding the nature of conflict, that between Europe today Continental U.S..

"The deepest roots of our modern tyrannies ... is the Greco-Roman notion of patriotism and the country, we owe to the classical secondary education that our universities have been copied from the French "JB Alberdi

The first right on earth is the right to liberty, to be a same, to own the fruits of our labor. Therefore the first duty is to himself.

Behind the concept of patriotism - and the Common Good and altruism - we have trained from earliest childhood for us to give us our freedom and voluntary surrender to slavery behind the patriot leader.

If physical slavery is repulsive how much more repulsive is the slavery of the spirit achieved through the education process? The conquered slave has a vestige of honor, has the merit of having resisted and see their condition is bad. But he who is enslaved voluntarily in the name of patriotism and love of others is transformed into the lowest of creatures. Degrades human dignity and degrades the concept of love.

The new politicians and their armies are parasites, are those who live on the fruits of the work of others, are the new oligarchy, are the new masters of the new slaves. The parasite uses the altruism and patriotism as a weapon of exploitation and reversed the moral principles of mankind.

Men have been taught that the highest virtue is not to create, but to give. However, you can not give what has been created. The creation is prior to distribution, because, otherwise, there would be nothing to distribute. The need for an operator is prior to that of a beneficiary. However, we have been taught to admire the parasite that distributes as gifts what has not occurred. We have been taught to despise the wealth-generating entrepreneur.

"It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God" (Luke 18:25) . find virtue in neglect and poverty and vice in the creation and wealth. This is the subversion of values \u200b\u200bfound at each step in schools, universities, the press and the church, this leads to poverty and violence of disintegration.

When I add the monstrous idea that man must find happiness in the sacrifice, the trap is sealed.

He was forced to accept masochism as his ideal, with sadism as an alternative.
This is the most terrible fraud that was perpetrated against humanity.

This is the artifice by which slavery and suffering they occurred as fundamentals of life.

Barbarism is the "werewolf of man is the master-slave or parasite-worker.

Civilization is the process of privacy, to free man's man, is the rule of law that protects individual liberties.

Now look at the results of a society based on privacy, individualism, individual freedom. Argentina 1853-1949 the country look more noble, the highest growth, the country's greatest achievements and greater freedom.

was based on man's right to the pursuit of happiness itself. His own happiness, not someone else. A private personal reason, individual.

Look at the results. Think of our grandparents who came to these shores fleeing slavery to be free, to own the fruits of their work, look into their consciences.

This is a perennial conflict, and one civilization fell after another.

parasite's interventional ethics of bureaucratic politics and second-class man, the new slave, the old monster is released and attacks left and right. Has led us to a level of intellectual indecency never equaled in the world. Has reached a level of unprecedented horror.

has poisoned every mind. It has engulfed Argentina and most of Europe. It is devouring United States.

Parasites looters - and their slaves victims - fail to notice the direct relationship between the prosperous and growing wealth and homeless children in the streets between the rise of bureaucracy and closed factories, including increased taxes and the rising level of corruption among public expenditure growth and the degradation of the human spirit, including the redistribution of income and lack of justice, including social justice and poverty and subsequent violence, between altruism and transfer of resources between patriotism and the destruction of the rule of law, including the Common Good and barbarism.

There is in man such thing as altruism in the sense of love for humanity. Solidarity and altruism are conditions of limited.

Love of neighbor is understood in the sense of near or acquaintance - friend, relative, etc. - Hence the politicians' solidarity and altruistic "care for the good of his nephews, lovers, children and most faithful friends, making them share the spoils with the growth of bureaucracy at its service, while helping them live off the fruits of the labor of others and without liability. At the same ceremony able to degrade and corrupt your soul.

Where To Buy Tare Panda

ARGENTINA IN THE REIGN OF THE HYENA

" policy skillful double rogue class "JB Alberdi


The performance of a government can be measured simply by the level of public spending.

In the Middle Ages serfs Feudal Lord brought to 30% of the fruits of their labor. In return he received security and justice. Argentines today accounts for 65% of the fruit of our work to the political bureaucracy and in return only receive physical and legal insecurity. We are therefore 10 times worse than the serfs of the Middle Ages whom we considered a slave.

Inflation, taxes, deductions, depreciation, debt, bonex, festival of bonds, convertible basket of currencies, plantain, Lecops, dollarization, recession, borrowing, stagnant, forfeiture of deposits, adjust, corruption, etc., are the sophisticated Public Expenditure children. Seemingly endless amount of resources that have developed policy looters Argentina to keep under the impoverished people. The State has become a fiction in which political looters are able to live the fruit of the work of others, legalized theft.

"The private thief is the least dangerous of the enemies of property" Juan Bautista Alberdi

According to Bertram de Jouvenel "of all the suitors power, neither has an interest in possession to reduce that wait a day access, or stop a machine that one day his turn came to use. Hence comes what is in the political circles of modern society a great complicity in favor of the expansion of public expenditure and the consequent extension of power. "

History shows that when there are no moral frameworks limiting state power, are represented by monarchies, aristocracies, or democracies, these are responsible for squeezing lemons to the governed as the sole care not to kill them because there will be no more juice out.

Paul Johnson has said "The state has emerged as an insatiable spender, an unparalleled wasteful, indeed, in the twentieth century is also revealed as the most responsible of all time mantazas"

The state is so arrogant and impotent. Makes a sickening effort to cover all sorts of things that escape or which can deal violated. While, under the pretext of common good and altruism-the state to swell and only managed to bring tightly hypertrophy individuals and there is no way out.

emerge from this situation should the need to retake the moral frameworks abandoned and become aware of the need to fight to regain freedom individual loss.

to tell your child that we pass to the Argentines, tell him to remember the Kingdom of the hyenas in the movie "The Lion King."

Quotation For Lighting A Lamp

THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL

"And your head is full of rats
you bought the shares in this farce" Bersuit


Common sense, morality and wisdom rest upon the ignorant and the wise. Intellectuals - as bad reason or trust people who understand evil - are the way to barbarism.

"... in the name of reason - and also other fundamental values \u200b\u200bthat are indispensable to civilized society, morally soar to mediocrity and induce the people to get carried away by their primitive instincts "Hayek

Under the influence of Descartes , modern rationalism not only discards the moral legacy, but he does not hesitate even to say that reason is able to create a new legal order and even a new language. Although such claims are entirely without foundation, have influenced current scientific thinking and in our writers, artists and intellectuals. The Cartesian dualism (theory that supports two conflicting principles irreducible to each other) opened the door to relativism and pragmatism first modern later.

was Another influential thinker Jean-Jacques Rousseau , despite romantic improper and followed in the footsteps of Descartes and had great influence on the thought "progressive" modern.
In The Social Contract says "Man is born free, but everywhere is in chains " in his attempt to free man from the heavy moral standards, transformed the hitherto had been considered the prototype of the wild , a hero of the intellectual class.

By stating that the animal instinct of man is capable of ordering human behavior more efficiently than the inherited moral or reason same. Establishing this way the idea of \u200b\u200b "General Will" by which man gives up his individuality, forming with the rest of the people a " single entity, a single unit staff," giving life to the abstract state , Nation and Fatherland, led by an alleged "common good" that is sanctified as the absolute power of moral climax.

In this way Rousseau does not know the ideological justification for individual rights and property rights and transforming man into a slave in the service of the Tyrant Patriot. (Adam Ferguson in 1767 defined the wild as someone who had not come to know the property.) This strategy

Rousseau influenced over the next two centuries in Western intellectuals, who see this strategy possible soar in power, behind the figure of the Platonic philosopher-king.

From this point, Pat Rousseau gave a social scientist, giving free rein to break free from inherited moral standards, encouraging even called "liberation" of this special way to infringe freedom.

The word will release from there, a new meaning, which would be exploited by all revolutionary and authoritarian regimes of the twentieth century, reaching its effects to the guardians of tradition - The church - with the liberation theology in Latin America.
Rousseau's ideas confused the men of the Revolution of May by Mariano Moreno, who dragged this influence to the press today.

The idea of \u200b\u200bthe noble savage become a hero of the intellectual class generated by the Geneva also affected our writers, and the prototype of the gaucho vague and thief were idealized in works such as Martin Fierro while the entrepreneur reviled in job creation , wealth and welfare as the negative aspect of civilization.
The consequences of the enormous influence of Rousseau's moral relativism, we can observe in backwardness, poverty and over one hundred and thirty million dead who were only in the twentieth century, and listen synthesized in the stanzas of tango "Siglo XX Cambalache" of Discepolín.

* * *

"Sigmund Freud was probably the biggest destroyer of culture" FA Hayek

In the film "15 Minutes" a Russian criminal arrives in U.S. and says: "That great western, nobody here is responsible for making" thereupon committed the most atrocious crimes, the films, sells the TV and then made the fool. Conclusion: millionaire and free.

The other side of individual freedom responsibility.

Freud's main objection is the denial of individual responsibility and this undermines the foundations of individual liberty.

Freud in his "Introduction to Psychoanalysis" refers to "the illusion of psychic freedom" which endorses the blame for whatever happens to "society" - or others outside the subject in question -.

Freud's work manages to look the other responsible for the irresponsibility of the individual.

The criminal is a " ill and therefore should be treated but never punished." This has got to liberate man from all liability, is that The arsonist is a pyromaniac, kleptomaniac is a thief, murderer suffering from temporary insanity or violent emotion. To commit a crime, just get high enough to make be declared innocent.

maniac For This way any ignorant, any worthless moron who commits a hideous crime, get us cries of sympathy and get an army of defenders humanitarian.

accepted that it is a cruel injustice to convict someone just because he is weak or small. However, this is the moral atmosphere of our century, the century of relativism, mediocrity and pragmatism.

With the Enlightenment, the growing enthusiasm in science, reinforces the confidence in reason. The reason becomes synonymous with the truth, is transformed into a new faith, which was weakening the moral legacy.

According to the teachings of Freud " compliance with moral standards only leads to neurosis" . On the other hand, must " discarded the principle of natural and original faculty, capable of distinguishing right from wrong" .

also argues that the prohibition of incest constitutes "mutilation more bloody, perhaps, that has won every time the erotic life of human beings" (Oedipus Complex).

These and many other mistakes have contributed to the weakening of the moral legacy. Popper asked

very careful to remove an individual responsibility - and especially young people - because, by taking away their responsibility, perhaps you're taking away the meaning of life.

channeled responsibility at work gives meaning to life.

"I think our time humanity will look basically like a superstition connected with the name of Freud" FA Hayek.

* * *



The Economicracia and John Maynard Keynes

Perhaps one of the greatest contributions economists have made to mankind in the twentieth century is the factual demonstration that the command economy extensive intervention by the state is counterproductive.

Countries created a Ministry of Economy for this purpose saw their economies succumb. Argentina is the clearest example.

While that kept the state away from natural tendency of men to intervene in the economy recorded the highest growth rates.

Although the experience is overwhelming in this regard the human mind requires a controller for managing a complex and spontaneous order.

Therefore it is necessary to limit and constrain human nature, creating a moral principle to prevent the natural tendency on the part of interventionist government of the day.

"When you try to read a journal of economy these days, often one wonders if there will be inadvertently taken a Journal of chemical or hydraulic. The crucial issues in economics are so mathematically approachable as a love letter or Christmas celebration. After pseudo-mechanical aggregates are individual people, their thoughts, feelings and value judgments. Not surprisingly, the chain of humiliating defeats suffered by the prophecy econometric, what is striking is the refusal of the defeated to admit defeat and learn more modesty. Some people apparently believe that the main function of the economy is to prepare the domination of society by the "experts" in economics, statistics and planning, this is a situation which I describe as "economicracia" a horrible word for a horrible thing. " Wilhelm Röpke

Keynes, one of the most prominent and influential economists of the twentieth century was marked by their contempt for the moral legacy, was to satirize the "conventional wisdom" and assert himself as an "amoral" - in the literal sense the term -. He coined the phrase

"Eventually all dead" with which he did not mind showing the damage inflicted on the long-term moral schemes, what mattered to him was to please the short term, which coincided with what public opinion required at all times, the demands and attitudes demagogic election.

to the enormous influence of his General Theory, we owe the only global inflation and subsequent mass unemployment.

As if this were not enough, we owe to Keynes the creation of the federal revenue sharing and "solidarity" International Credit Organizations: The International Monetary Fund and World Bank institutions have only served to transfer resources from workers in rich areas, the rich and poor areas, condemning these to the scourge of corruption of its political leadership.

In this way Keynes has contributed to the Sovietization of countries with much more efficiency that have earned the communities themselves, and even unconsciously, helped to undermine the edifice of freedom. Total eventually all dead and today is no longer.

* * *
effect
Marx defined "magic" made by a large order of human cooperation, as Capitalism. And he said, it could be defined as full respect for the law of property.

argued that capitalism would evolve into a new order that common denominator and that could be defined as the total elimination of Ownership.

This idea generated much excitement in the universities, assuming the same trend, which was recorded in the hard sciences and semi-hard, could also affect the field of law, opening the way to what is known as social rights .

Why this aversion to property rights? First, "the property was the result of theft" - using the invasions to neighboring - and as in the case of the chicken and the egg, it was not possible to identify an owner true original.

Second, in pre-industrial Europe land was the only source of wealth. The finiteness of the earth, generating the natural resentment - envy - to property, as land in the hands of a person depriving another of the same. The privately owned property contrasts with plural product of the industrial revolution.

Ortega y Gasset, in the prologue of the Revolt of the Masses, said " be - an intellectual - left is like being on the right, one of the countless ways that man can choose to be a jerk, both in effect, are forms of moral hemiplegia "

paradigms left and right are communism and national socialism respectively. In the first case the government uses and has the property de jure and de facto, while in the second, the government recognizes de jure the de facto property while using and dispose of it. Both views are mixed on the same aversion to the property and therefore individual rights.



"Why do we bother going to socialize banks and factories? We socialize with people. " Adolf Hitler

Who won World War II? These ideas achieved something like the victory in defeat Does this is not the plan carried out in Argentina by the Ministry of Education? Are these not the main intellectual leaders that obscure our universities?

Freud and Marx - Keynes and Rousseau and so many others - were very clear in claiming scientific status for his theories and based many of his conclusions on the authority of being "scientific." Once this point is assumed, the term "social science" becomes suspect.

Social scientists have, in fact, every effort to imitate the method of natural sciences, but its success has been extremely limited.

These intellectuals given more to the utopian dream that the discipline of rigorous analysis, permeated and dominated the University of the West, of superstitions during the twentieth century, managing to change our moral code and change our behavior.

Universities through the educational process managed to change the exo-somatic genetic material that are culture and traditions - changed the DNA of civilization - creating a new culture cloned armies of Barbarians fans of his new faith, service destruction of civilization. Today absorbed attend the gruesome spectacle generated by their idealized utopias.

" must reject the idea that the scientific habit increases the individual's mental capacity. Repeatedly experience contradicts the assumption that those who stand in the exercise of any scientific field, are able to deal more intelligently, the problems of ordinary life "Wilfred Trotter

* * * The Father

Our stated: "Thy will, not mine." The moral right is not dependent on our will - for scientific enough - and our choice, can lead to infringements of the values \u200b\u200bwe were trying to defend.

Which Indian Heroine Has Big Boobs

THE MARKET IDEAS

Front Of My Hair Thining

INTELLIGENCE IS A QUALITY INDIVIDUAL is projected in some peers, then usually disappears. THE AXIS OF EVIL

Socrates 416 BC Athens presence "Electra" of Euripides, in the stands two rivals: Sophocles and Aristophanes. A cheating student, Plato. Florence

1504. The Renaissance: a thinker Machiavelli. "Palazo Vecchio, two opposite walls, two painters, Leonardo Da Vinci right, left, Miguel Angel. An apprentice Raphael.

England from 1688 to 1790. Glorious Revolution and Industrial Revolution. A playwright, William Shakespeare, three teachers: Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, three moralists: David Hume, Adam Smith and Adam Ferguson, a biologist Charles Darwin. Philadelphia

1776 - 1787. Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution. Adams, Franklin, Jefferson, Washington, Hamilton and Madison. Nobody had much.

Argentina 1816-1853. Declaration of Independence and Constitution of the Republic of Argentina. Belgrano, Alberdi, Sarmiento and Urquiza.

Those great men, the rebels are in the first chapter of every legend mankind has recorded since its inception.

Throughout the centuries there have been men who have taken steps in new roads armed with nothing but their own vision. Moses, Socrates, Jesus, Copernicus, their goals differed, but they all had this in common: their way was the first his vision was important and the response received was the scorn, hatred of bureaucrats parasites. These heroes had to pay for their bravery.

The great creators, thinkers, artists, scientists, inventors, men fought alone of his era. Every new thought was rejected. Every great invention doomed. Prometheus was chained to a rock to be devoured by vultures for stealing fire from the Gods. But since then men have fire for warmth, cooking, to light their caves.

The first motor was considered foolish. The plane impossible. The loom, an evil. The first anesthesia is considered sinful. But those visionaries continued. They fought, suffered and paid for his greatness. But his achievements were imposed.

We are the heirs of those struggles. Now we face the same enemy is within us. Therefore, the intelligence tends to disappear and people to die. Argentina is the latest and best example of boom and decline of a nation.

We are victims of classical secondary education that our universities copied from continental Europe. In the universities were formed rulers turned-looters parasites that are responsible for this deleterious effect.
They are not interested in the creation, ideas, work. Only interested people. No wonder: "Is this true?" Wonder "Is this what others think is right?". No judge, repeat. Do not give the impression they do. Do not think, apparently. They have no skill, just friends. Have no merit, only influences. They do not care, they care that others think they know.

What is your purpose in life? Greatness in the eyes of others. Fame, admiration, envy all that comes from others. The others dictate their beliefs. Do not want to be great, but others think they are great. Parasites cheat and lie, but retain a respectable facade. They are known dishonest but others think you are honest. Seek power, for others the fawn. Profess love to hang lower and less equipped to establish their superiority by comparison. They are men whose sole purpose is to get power or make money to show off, impress, and the front cover of misery and emptiness that hide under your skin.

They are the destroyers of the creators, are the moral values \u200b\u200bthat subvert and destroy entire countries and civilizations. They are men without direction. Power without responsibility. They are not open to dialogue. I can not speak, and they can not hear. When they reach to behave like primates afraid. Attack to avoid detection. Cry for others to believe they have authority. Behind every act need a survey to see if what they say is what others want to hear. Do not look for solutions, looking guilty. Those who are not with them are their enemies. They have a special hatred for the creators and entrepreneurs. Immediately recognize the independents. Instinctively. They know that in front of them are laid bare. Accept anything but an independent who hurts them because they are not there and that is the only form of existence they know. They believe that the man of genius is guilty by definition. What level of degradation of society has fallen when sentencing a person because he is strong and big? They are taught

to look for yourself in others. Have been educated for centuries by the doctrine of selflessness, patriotism and the Common Good as the moral ideal. The men have accepted the only way I could accept it, seeking self-esteem in others. Mental living as parasites. And this opened the door to all sorts of horrors.

are dogmatic, they believe in an ideology and are persuaded. They are fanatics and will not accept any arguments. Doubt is a sign of weakness. Criticism immoral. They are the epitome of the Closed Society. They are trained in universities. They are the best examples of barbarism Illustrated. Do not understand why seek happiness and never found, they are looking in the wrong place: in the other.

Wedding Out Of Office

"the evil in the world almost always comes of ignorance, and good will without vision can cause as much havoc as evil. Men are more good than bad, and indeed this is not the issue. Just do not know, more or less, and this is called a virtue or vice, as vice more desperate is the vice of ignorance that thinks he knows everything and then allowed to kill " Albert Camus (1947) The

" Common Good "in a community, a race, class, of a State, has been the claim and justification of every tyranny has been imposed on men.

The greatest horrors in history have been committed in the name of altruistic mobile.

"The flaw lies in the human hypocrisy or the nature of the principle?

The biggest butchers were the most sincere.

believed in the perfect society reached through the stake, the guillotine or the firing squad. Nobody questioned their right to murder, for murdering a patriotic purpose.

was accepted that man should be enslaved by other men.

Nobody questioned the high taxes because they "steal for the crown" - or country - or steal to others with a selfless purpose.
Change
actors, but the course of the tragedy remains the same: a humanitarian who starts with declarations of love for mankind and ends with a sea of \u200b\u200bblood.

This phenomenon continues and will continue as long as men believe that the action is good if it is altruistic or patriotic.

That allows patriotism and altruism act and forces his victim to endure.

The leaders of the patriotic movements ask nothing for themselves. But look at the results.

learn from the hands of Kant - who had welcomed the French Revolution - that can commit the most heinous crimes in the name of freedom, equality and fraternity.

also taught us that fanaticism - born of patriotism, altruism and the idea of \u200b\u200bthe common good - is always wrong and incompatible with the goal of a peaceful and pluralistic society, and it is our duty to oppose any form, even if their goals are ethically unobjectionable and even more when their goals coincide with our own personal goals.

Do not show us the history of religions and revolutions that the fanatical belief in an ethical idea not only corrupts, but time and again turns into its opposite? Popper.

" The main problem of our time .... not due to our moral evil but rather to our often misguided moral enthusiasm, to our anxiety to improve the world in which we live. Our wars are fundamentally religious wars are wars among competing theories on how to establish a better world. And our moral enthusiasm is often misdirected, because we realize that our moral principles which are generally very simple, they are usually difficult to apply to complex human situations and policies which must necessarily apply "K. Popper. An optimistic view

intellectuals to trust their ideas build beautiful and pleasant fictions (Matrix).

The intellectual utopia - whether left or right - believe that the perfect social system is perfectly possible, and only the ignorance of some, versus perfect knowledge of others, prevents it. Cree also fully aware means that social system are achievable.

Therefore, a good world, however imperfect, is intolerable. Is consistent: if the social perfection is just around the corner, why not speed up your conclusion? And if some, through ignorance or selfishness, hinder it, is it not justifiable a just war against them? Thus Popper has captured so deadly logic and coherence of the violent revolutionary intellectual.

La Barbarie is always illustrated by the tendency of the human mind to make the complex simple.

The intellectual comes out of its Barbaro While recognizing the complexity of the problems and takes its limits and its ignorance, it improves their tolerance, increases your wisdom and humility. Back

this way to acknowledge that truth is objective - as Xenophanes (-700) - the truth exists, but we can not recognize it, only we approach it.

This achieves open systems of knowledge, learning and a search without end.

We approach this way to open society and the individual to the status of sage "who knows, who knows."

This is the way to the abandonment of moral relativism, fanaticism and pragmatism that permeates today our universities.

Aluminum Boat Floor Layment

THE CONSTITUTION: THE DNA OF CIVILIZATION

The country's political system is based on the Constitution's moral code as their genetic code, DNA.

Rights are a moral concept and morality is a matter of choice.

Men are free not to choose morality and human cooperation generating wealth as the standard of morals and laws, but not free to escape the fact that the result is a cannibal society, which survives for a time devouring those who work and create wealth, then collapses like a cancerous body, when healthy are eaten by patients.

" affirm, also, that if mankind refused to accept the above traditions, sentenced to death and misery to much of the current population" Hayek

Countries have constitutions more pleasant and virtuous - product of the good intentions of its intellectuals - are the poorest in Africa and the lowest in Latin America.

The Constitution is a tool that seeks to limit human nature, thus achieving changes in behavior of the barbarian within us to transform it into a civilized being. Achieved in this way transform the warrior society, intolerant, violent and backward in a commercial society, tolerant, peaceful and prosperous.

Intellectuals, as we have seen, working for the marketplace of ideas gain more influence and benefit of nice ideas that certain ideas, manage to impose constitutions nice to end up producing the opposite effect, leading the country to barbarism.

The successive constitutional reforms succeeded in changing our DNA to end peaceful and prosperous Argentina of our grandparents, and launching - with the best intentions that includes notions of social justice - at the end of justice and barbarism that we are now enduring.

The idea that "social rights" are above the "rule of law" is in our nature, are limited order early - the small group - but inhibit the development of extensive partnerships, we must understand and learn from our mistakes, and here lies the difference between civilization and barbarism. As we warned

M. Moreno - The Rousseau Coryphaeus - if we are not clear on these issues " new uncertainties will happen to the old, will our luck change without destroying tyrants tyranny."

Democracy fails without individual rights and becomes the right of the majority to oppress the minority. We spent the rule of law to the State Nature we are living today.

The solution to this grave problem is easier than you think, since the restoration of the 1853 Constitution, or rather the U.S. - would put everything in place again.

70% of the laws would be ineffective as unconstitutional (and immoral) and will reinstate the rule of law and justice reappear.

Security Legal generate more investments in various fields of human endeavor. This would work for all, increase the capitalization rate and, consequently, wages begin to rise.

So expand the benefits of freedom announcing the preamble to our Constitution. Everything

accommodate rapidly, according to those moral values \u200b\u200bthat are the only guarantee us peace and progress. Having again limited framework of the Republic to be rebuilt and federalism.

Our problem is moral, ignoring this topic keep the public disoriented.

No one can find a way out for himself if society is dragged to his destruction.

A true that 152 years of peaceful revolution - The Constitution of 1853 - is our obligation to return to the path that deliberately leave and return to replace the Reason of State for the total respect for individual rights. Today

Urquiza is gone, but Alberdi lives in the heart of every Argentine. Thus each in its own interest should participate vigorously in the intellectual battle. Nobody can remain indifferent, the outcome of this struggle depends on the interests of all.

We must learn from the tragedy Argentina that for good and noble our intentions if we do not respect the rule of law - justice, property and individual freedom - ever produced tremendous damage especially to the needy.

intellectuals do not understand the spontaneous and Complex Moral law and the Constitution - as well as language, and money market - trying to give answers to the questions raised in a very simple, using the tool at hand, the reason.

But reason finds limits to understand and accept the supremacy of spontaneous order in situations of high complexity. Are the same boundaries as the human mind prevents him from understanding clearly, issues of time and space when escaping from a limited scale.

David Hume said that all science must begin with the science of the human mind, where every man is a complex set of feelings and passions found, with virtues and defects, wisdom and stupidity. These ingredients are present in greater or lesser degree each of us .

The nature of the human mind prevents us from clearly understanding spontaneous order in situations of high complexity.

mind to justify the use of complex systems - an evolutionary process - first taboo, then the myths and superstitions and finally religious systems.

The human mind understands the order in accordance with existing arrangements simple - so the natural tendency of the human mind toward central planning - as well as the movement requires the presence of life or the presence of a clock requires the presence of a watchmaker, the presence of an order in nature leads us to assume the presence of a higher mind that created that order.

For the same reason the order in a society demand of the human mind the presence of a computer, the ruler.

The ruling will not understand the supremacy of spontaneous order has a natural tendency to intervene. This does imbalances that lead to tense situations of civilization.

His own mistakes - induced by the very nature of the human mind - in addition to the involvement of the eyes of the governed, are transformed over time nature in Tirana.

So - today as 100,000 years ago - the main tool of the human mind, the reason it is not suitable enough for the understanding of the supremacy of spontaneous order, and leads us to the construction of fictions and superstitions to justify the phenomena around us.

Therefore, the reason is like the hammer tool, when applied correctly on a nail gives us a benefit, but when it is misused it becomes a weapon that can be deadly to humans. Today

development problems in different fields, under different names such as autopoiesis, cybernetics, self-organization, hunting, systems theory, etc., helps understanding of the supremacy of spontaneous orders, over the planned order, especially in complex situations -.

The only country in history was defeated U.S. moral relativism by maintaining a Moral Constitution managed to keep away from the utopian dreams - which eventually lead to self-destructive situations - its intellectuals.