Tuesday, August 15, 2006

Alan87 Koncówka Mocy

ERROR OF HISTORY IS MORAL CAPITALISM? ARGENTINA

Human cooperation - or capitalism - is developed in countries where there is rule of law and the people own the fruits of their labor.

Capitalism - or ethics of liberty - has been shown in fact be the best system where you live, where the poor achieve the best standards of living and where they reach the highest levels of tolerance and peaceful coexistence. Argentina 1853-1945 was a clear example of this.

Capitalism allows for more and more immigrants arriving from the geographies of ethics for state intervention in search of a place where we could own the fruits of their work and stop being slaves to serve the omnipotence of the state behind of an ideology - left or right - the subject and destroys. Argentina was the best example of both in the past - when receiving immigration - and present - where the Argentines have to migrate for freedom, that is a place where owning the fruits of their labor -.

Capitalism is the development of humanity in the widest diversity. Capitalism promotes an important aspect of human nature, inequality.

Why inequality of men is better for capitalism?

The wide array of human cooperation is like a leafy tree where each branch is a consequence of inequality and leaves that develop in these branches are the companies that generate jobs, call for workers and behind Workers there are families that are consolidated and children growing up without gaps.

The more unequal the society but will the tree branches, more and more branches hold more and more leaves. Inequality thus increased the capacity to generate employment and contribute to raising the standard of living of society as a whole.

The entrepreneur is looking for a new branch (inequality) of human activity in order to meet her so we can enrich and generate more and more work in developing the virtuous cycle of Capitalism.

Employers get rich on the ethics of liberty must generate the good people who do not know - Must meet the needs of others through free and voluntary agreements - and only when it does you can get rich.

The Ethics of Liberty the employer is a benefactor of mankind. And the richer the more it has provided to persons not meeting their needs known. We could then say that Billy Gates - to be the richest businessman - is the greatest benefactor of mankind as the computer and the Internet are creating a benefit to the people who freely and voluntarily choose to purchase these products to improve the quality of life of their own.

The Ethics of Liberty by the employer, the creator, is admired, is an example for youth and a stimulus to follow. The employer is protected from the natural tendency of man to destroy the rule of law that protects the majority who seek their destruction - as we saw in "intelligence: a quality individual" -.

societies in the ethics of freedom has the highest support and solidarity with minorities. Argentina was a clear example of this to change their moral code and political direction.

On the other hand, the ethics of state intervention - whether left or right - by increasing public spending, the tree is achieved in the economy is extremely weak. The idea of \u200b\u200bequality of people achieved a tree with few branches and few leaves per branch. This generates low wages and poor quality of life of society as a whole and creates a large unemployment. This situation generates the need for increased public spending to meet increasingly unemployed who are without work. This is the vicious circle of PJ.

businessman, to develop in these circumstances, need to get grants and help which has to be allied to political power to obtain privileges or monopolies that guarantee their survival.

The businessman in the ethics of state intervention - while a victim of State - is corrupt that takes advantage of captive markets to enrich themselves. To clear his conscience do any work "solidarity" that grace to maintain their privileges.

The employer becomes a second class being not only rights but obligations, is the ox pulling the cart and who is to demand and extort. Social rights swept the rule of law and this left the employer at the mercy of political whims and fancies of the moment.

In the ethics of the political bureaucratic state intervention is the successful and admired, but the living is the fruit of the labor of others - the thief is live - you live the other, who receives everything without anything.

The illusion of ownership - generated in PJ ethics - achieved the modern slave wear yourself out working to defend and retain their property from attack by bureaucrats through taxes. Achieving the transfer of resources from working to not working. Through this mechanism is achieved by the new slave to work much more than the old slave, having no property to defend his work left much earlier.

The ethics of intervention produces business cycle more or less 7 years, culminating in a collapse of the system. Seven fat years, seven lean and collapse of the system - through transfer of resources -.

The system is very perverse PJ honest workers and highly destructive to the poor, while that is an incentive for corruption and crime. This creates tension that ends civilization with large transfers of resources first, then killings.

CAPITALISM = RULE OF LAW OR = CIVILIZATION

SOCIAL Justicialista = = BARBARITY

0 comments:

Post a Comment