The country's political system is based on the Constitution's moral code as their genetic code, DNA.
Rights are a moral concept and morality is a matter of choice.
Men are free not to choose morality and human cooperation generating wealth as the standard of morals and laws, but not free to escape the fact that the result is a cannibal society, which survives for a time devouring those who work and create wealth, then collapses like a cancerous body, when healthy are eaten by patients.
" affirm, also, that if mankind refused to accept the above traditions, sentenced to death and misery to much of the current population" Hayek
Countries have constitutions more pleasant and virtuous - product of the good intentions of its intellectuals - are the poorest in Africa and the lowest in Latin America.
The Constitution is a tool that seeks to limit human nature, thus achieving changes in behavior of the barbarian within us to transform it into a civilized being. Achieved in this way transform the warrior society, intolerant, violent and backward in a commercial society, tolerant, peaceful and prosperous.
Intellectuals, as we have seen, working for the marketplace of ideas gain more influence and benefit of nice ideas that certain ideas, manage to impose constitutions nice to end up producing the opposite effect, leading the country to barbarism.
The successive constitutional reforms succeeded in changing our DNA to end peaceful and prosperous Argentina of our grandparents, and launching - with the best intentions that includes notions of social justice - at the end of justice and barbarism that we are now enduring.
The idea that "social rights" are above the "rule of law" is in our nature, are limited order early - the small group - but inhibit the development of extensive partnerships, we must understand and learn from our mistakes, and here lies the difference between civilization and barbarism. As we warned
M. Moreno - The Rousseau Coryphaeus - if we are not clear on these issues " new uncertainties will happen to the old, will our luck change without destroying tyrants tyranny."
Democracy fails without individual rights and becomes the right of the majority to oppress the minority. We spent the rule of law to the State Nature we are living today.
The solution to this grave problem is easier than you think, since the restoration of the 1853 Constitution, or rather the U.S. - would put everything in place again.
70% of the laws would be ineffective as unconstitutional (and immoral) and will reinstate the rule of law and justice reappear.
Security Legal generate more investments in various fields of human endeavor. This would work for all, increase the capitalization rate and, consequently, wages begin to rise.
So expand the benefits of freedom announcing the preamble to our Constitution. Everything
accommodate rapidly, according to those moral values \u200b\u200bthat are the only guarantee us peace and progress. Having again limited framework of the Republic to be rebuilt and federalism.
Our problem is moral, ignoring this topic keep the public disoriented.
No one can find a way out for himself if society is dragged to his destruction.
A true that 152 years of peaceful revolution - The Constitution of 1853 - is our obligation to return to the path that deliberately leave and return to replace the Reason of State for the total respect for individual rights. Today
Urquiza is gone, but Alberdi lives in the heart of every Argentine. Thus each in its own interest should participate vigorously in the intellectual battle. Nobody can remain indifferent, the outcome of this struggle depends on the interests of all.
We must learn from the tragedy Argentina that for good and noble our intentions if we do not respect the rule of law - justice, property and individual freedom - ever produced tremendous damage especially to the needy.
intellectuals do not understand the spontaneous and Complex Moral law and the Constitution - as well as language, and money market - trying to give answers to the questions raised in a very simple, using the tool at hand, the reason.
But reason finds limits to understand and accept the supremacy of spontaneous order in situations of high complexity. Are the same boundaries as the human mind prevents him from understanding clearly, issues of time and space when escaping from a limited scale.
David Hume said that all science must begin with the science of the human mind, where every man is a complex set of feelings and passions found, with virtues and defects, wisdom and stupidity. These ingredients are present in greater or lesser degree each of us .
The nature of the human mind prevents us from clearly understanding spontaneous order in situations of high complexity.
mind to justify the use of complex systems - an evolutionary process - first taboo, then the myths and superstitions and finally religious systems.
The human mind understands the order in accordance with existing arrangements simple - so the natural tendency of the human mind toward central planning - as well as the movement requires the presence of life or the presence of a clock requires the presence of a watchmaker, the presence of an order in nature leads us to assume the presence of a higher mind that created that order.
For the same reason the order in a society demand of the human mind the presence of a computer, the ruler.
The ruling will not understand the supremacy of spontaneous order has a natural tendency to intervene. This does imbalances that lead to tense situations of civilization.
His own mistakes - induced by the very nature of the human mind - in addition to the involvement of the eyes of the governed, are transformed over time nature in Tirana.
So - today as 100,000 years ago - the main tool of the human mind, the reason it is not suitable enough for the understanding of the supremacy of spontaneous order, and leads us to the construction of fictions and superstitions to justify the phenomena around us.
Therefore, the reason is like the hammer tool, when applied correctly on a nail gives us a benefit, but when it is misused it becomes a weapon that can be deadly to humans. Today
development problems in different fields, under different names such as autopoiesis, cybernetics, self-organization, hunting, systems theory, etc., helps understanding of the supremacy of spontaneous orders, over the planned order, especially in complex situations -.
The only country in history was defeated U.S. moral relativism by maintaining a Moral Constitution managed to keep away from the utopian dreams - which eventually lead to self-destructive situations - its intellectuals.
0 comments:
Post a Comment