Perhaps most common mistake in historical processes is to confuse the fruit of a process that ends, as achievements of the process started. For example, the PJ in 1945 he inherited a country that had accumulated capital for over 70 years of dedicated workers heir, hopeful, grateful to God for the opportunity that is open to suit. The children were privileged to live in families that progressed and consolidated.
These results were generated on the ethics of the freedom of our Founding Constitution, were the fruits of that wealth-generating moral and peaceful coexistence which was confused with the splendor of the Peronist era that had just begun.
The real fruits of the Peronist era is that today we can observe after a sustained period of enforcement of the moral interventionist and they are:
A country with 40% unemployed and under-occupied.
A country with desperate people crowded jails because a new "invisible hand" created by interventionist ethics stripped them of any possibility of supporting them with the fruits of their labor, which no longer exists.
A country with the lowest wages in the world.
a country of slaves, which contributes almost 70% of the fruits of their labor to political authority.
A leader in political corruption now occupying the second place worldwide. A country
producing a generation of subhumans who are forced to eat garbage and rats to survive in a country that produces food for over 300 million people.
A country of malnourished children bear the brunt of the violence that is the abandonment of the streets to the sound of God, finally.
A country of picketers, groups of people rounded up by the consequences of interventionist ethics that puts the most shameful indignity of having to go out and do violence to the rest of the population for someone to attend and is anticipating us a clear path civil war.
These are the real fruits of ethics Justicialist interventionist.
say confuse old results with new processes, is the most common mistake in history, and they are often confused for example the pyramids of Egypt to the period of splendor of that civilization. But the glory was based on the ethics of freedom Dynasty developed during 2 nd and 3 rd and the pyramids were produced when interventionist ethics surfaced with increasing public expenditure was symbolizing and subsequent stagnation and decline. Plato
produce the great schism in the political thought of Greece, ending with the ethics of freedom and initiating the decline of this civilization. Plato exaltation Insite the leader, in the Laws says "the most important principle of all is that nobody, whether male or female, was without a leader. No mind is accustomed to do anything based on their own initiative. "
Then in the Republic tells us that his ideal state is one in which "have in common with women, children and property. It should be possible to eradicate all of our lives all over what is private and individual. " Yet history confuses Plato and the highest point of the Greek Civilization.
We can see the same error as the Roman Empire where the splendor merges Empire - the result of the accumulation of wealth in his time of freedom, trade boom and the creation of Roman law - with the development of the Roman army and the corruption of their Emperor and Senate, which was beginning to make its moral decadence.
same thing happened in China in the twelfth century, a free society that traded with the world, discovered the printing press, gunpowder, and even the extraction of oil. But that company also collapsed on the same grounds.
same fate Spain in the fifteenth century, an open society where they lived peacefully working Christians, Jews and Muslims. Be traded with the whole world discovered the new continent and its school of Salamanca led modern thought. But the fanaticism of the hand of the Crusades and the Inquisition did their thing.
As we can see the disintegration of a free and prosperous society always comes from within the same. This is vitally important to get right to implement a Constitution to protect and sanctify the natural tendency of man to change the DNA of civilization.
0 comments:
Post a Comment